Do I have Free Will or is it the other way around? From my observations, it looks like the so called "free will" seems to have a body.
If I had free will why am I inclined to so easily engage in self-destructive behavior?
S
Thursday, July 22, 2010
Problems with - God As Creator
Having a creator is such a beautiful concept. It feels so good when you think of God as 'THE Creator' of our world. The only problem I have is - I don't want GOD to be connected (even remotely) some of the things that I don't like here.
There lies the problem #1. If I give credit to God with creation, then it's either all or nothing. If I omit even a single thing then I need a good explanation on how that little thing came into existence without god's help.
Problem #2 is why God would create this world? If God has a reason, then the very existence of a reason destroys the beauty of God concept. God could be no different than his subjects.
Problem #3 is what did God use to create this world? If it was created from NOTHING then this world is not that real. Consequences of this world have no much relevance out God. If the world was created from something, then a follow-on question would be - where did THAT come from?
The simple alternative is to not connect God with the creation at all. It might be entirely possible that something like our world can exist without ever being created....
July 22nd 2010.
There lies the problem #1. If I give credit to God with creation, then it's either all or nothing. If I omit even a single thing then I need a good explanation on how that little thing came into existence without god's help.
Problem #2 is why God would create this world? If God has a reason, then the very existence of a reason destroys the beauty of God concept. God could be no different than his subjects.
Problem #3 is what did God use to create this world? If it was created from NOTHING then this world is not that real. Consequences of this world have no much relevance out God. If the world was created from something, then a follow-on question would be - where did THAT come from?
The simple alternative is to not connect God with the creation at all. It might be entirely possible that something like our world can exist without ever being created....
July 22nd 2010.
Problems with - God As Creator
Having a creator is such a beautiful concept. It feels so good when you think of God as 'THE Creator' of our world. The only problem I have is - I don't want GOD to be connected (even remotely) some of the things that I don't like here.
There lies the problem #1. If I give credit to God with creation, then it's either all or nothing. If I omit even a single thing then I need a good explanation on how that little thing came into existence without god's help.
Problem #2 is why God would create this world? If God has a reason, then the very existence of a reason destroys the beauty of God concept. God could be no different than his subjects.
Problem #3 is what did God use to create this world? If it was created from NOTHING then this world is not that real. Consequences of this world have no much relevance out God. If the world was created from something, then a follow-on question would be - where did THAT come from?
The simple alternative is to not connect God with the creation at all. It might be entirely possible that something like our world can exist without ever being created....
July 22nd 2010.
There lies the problem #1. If I give credit to God with creation, then it's either all or nothing. If I omit even a single thing then I need a good explanation on how that little thing came into existence without god's help.
Problem #2 is why God would create this world? If God has a reason, then the very existence of a reason destroys the beauty of God concept. God could be no different than his subjects.
Problem #3 is what did God use to create this world? If it was created from NOTHING then this world is not that real. Consequences of this world have no much relevance out God. If the world was created from something, then a follow-on question would be - where did THAT come from?
The simple alternative is to not connect God with the creation at all. It might be entirely possible that something like our world can exist without ever being created....
July 22nd 2010.
Sunday, June 14, 2009
Encounters with God - Chat One
Me: God, Why did you create this world?
God: Don't you have to first prove conclusively that God exists? How can you assume that there a creator and it is me?
Me: I define you 'as' the creator.
God: If 'You' defined "me" as the creator, then why are you asking the question?
Me: You don't get it...
God: If I created, then there must be a reason and purpose as well right?
Me: That's what everyone thinks here.
God: What would that purpose be?
Me: We don't know clearly. That is why I am asking you this question.
God: See you are so easy to persuade. Now, you think I have created this and not only that, now you think there is a reason and purpose for this creation. Oh MY GOD!!! You are so impressionable. You just believe any thing that is put in a sentence. I am sure you can do better than that.
Me: You think so?
God: There you go again. You got to quit that habit.
Thursday, June 11, 2009
The missing background
The following keeps popping up once in a while. I better get this on to contrasted colors (i.e words).
There are three key Components for any observation or even existence. For change to be noticed something that has not changed during the change is necessary as a reference, plus an observer who claims to have witnessed the change with the help of the reference. Without these three participants, is it possible for change to exist?
This logic even extends to observing anything that has a physical qualities (shape, size, form etc.,).
To be able to observe black colored object - there must be something that is not black.
To observe white, I need something that is not white.
To observe a circle, I need a background that is not a circle.
With this line of thought -
to observe a feeling, there must be something that is not a feeling
to observe a thought, there must be something that is not a thought
to observe a world around me, there must be something that is not a world.
I see the world around me is changing every moment in a four dimensional world. I was there to witness and observe two states of world around me and deduce that it has changed. What is the changeless background I used to make this observation? That background is right here and all over yet it is not accessible for objective grasp.
- Saturday 2009 June 14th 5:23 AM.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
